Throughput (tokens / sec)
median 131.3tokens/s
Your requests run on GPUs we own, in our own EU data center, run by a European company.
The throughput you measure on day one is the throughput you plan production around.
Automatic failover, spending limits, and EU-only data handling keep high-volume inference controlled and safe to scale.
GPU routing tuned for throughput and latency — the same speed and reliability, at consistently lower cost.
Faster token generation and sub-second responses, with identical output.
Infrastructure built for sustained inference load, not occasional demo traffic.
Reused context bills at a lower cache-read rate, so repeated workloads cost less.
Compare Entrim’s pricing, powered by an optimized inference runtime, against other providers using the same token counts per request.
Estimate your Savings
Select a model
Token usage(Usage split, 10:1: 9B input - 909M output)
| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Monthly est. |
|---|---|---|---|
| AkashML | $0.45 | $3.20 | $7,000.00 |
| io.net | $0.44 | $3.15 | $6,863.64 |
| Chutes | $0.40 | $3.00 | $6,363.64 |
| Entrim | $0.10 | $0.40 | $1,272.73 Save up to 80% |
Agentic coding with image input and 1M context
Multimodal coding agents with 1M context
Dense multimodal coding with thinking control
median 131.3tokens/s
median 1,247ms
99.9%
Measured across the last 30 days.
99.8%
Successful API responses across the last 30 days.
200B+
Built to handle sustained high-volume inference workloads.
Code examples
curl -X POST "https://api.entrim.ai/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $ENTRIM_API_KEY" \ -d '{ "model": "your-model-name", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "Why do they call it a building if it is already built?" } ] }'SDKs & docs
Use familiar SDK patterns with quickstart examples for common production setups.
OpenAI-compatible
Keep the request format your team already knows.
No cold starts
Production requests are served without model spin-up delays.
Prompts and outputs are processed for inference, not stored after completion, and never used to train models.
Prompts, outputs, and request metadata stay on EU soil — no transfer to third countries, no sub-processors outside the EU. DPA available.
Requests are encrypted, access is isolated by API key, and traffic is handled with tenant-level separation.
Controls are being built around recognised security frameworks, with limited operational metadata used for billing, monitoring, latency, and abuse prevention.
For companies where LLM inference is part of the product COGS — AI assistants, vertical SaaS, copilots, companion apps, and generative workflows running at user scale.
For product teams shipping AI into existing apps — summaries, search, recommendations, automation, and user-facing AI actions that need predictable cost per feature.
For conversational AI, support automation, and agent workflows where latency, retry loops, and per-interaction economics directly affect margins.
For RAG, document extraction, contract review, claims processing, internal knowledge assistants, and other high-volume text-heavy pipelines.
I’ve already tested multiple inference providers, including Makora, Baseten, Novita, and Crof. So far, this one seems to deliver the fastest response times and the best overall performance for my use case.
JanMinecraft plugin developer
After testing multiple open-weight LLM inference providers, Entrim stood out from the crowd. Most platforms suffer from slow speeds due to being oversubscribed or lack trustworthy jurisdictions and data retention policies. Entrim ticked all the boxes. Because they are an EU-based company that completely self-hosts their own infrastructure rather than acting as a middleman, I finally have total peace of mind regarding data privacy. On top of that, the service is incredibly fast and easy to use.
DavidHead of Delivery
We’ve integrated Entrim into AgentOS as a custom provider, and it has been working very well. We’ve been using it as our primary provider for around a month, and overall the experience has been very positive.
KazımFounder of AgentOS
You’ve made good progress on quality. I’ve been using your DeepSeek model and gave Qwen 3.8 27B a brief try. I can see that your quantization is solid and that you’re actively working on quality.

Mykyta TkachenkoCEO at KDB Soft
Overall, I’m very happy with the service — I think your product is coming at exactly the right time, and both the performance and speed have been great so far. No complaints on latency or reliability.
Jiri
I have been using Entrim’s DeepSeek model with DeepSeek’s harness and it works so good, I am really impressed!
AsadApp developer